The human always decides.
Our approach to using AI responsibly is not a compliance page. It is built into how Wavn works.
Wavn proposes; it does not decide. Locking a decision is an act by you, recorded as yours. There is no setting that changes this, because it is not a setting.
Where the voices disagree, you see the disagreement. Contested points are drawn as contested. Blending three views into one smooth answer would be the confident wrongness the whole product exists to prevent.
If nothing can back a claim, Wavn says exactly that. An unknown drawn as an empty space is how people get caught out, and they would never learn the product had been guessing.
When Wavn confirms work, the work exists, checkably, above being helpful and above sounding confident. When a job fails, you get what it had and the wall it hit, named.
Wavn reads only what you put in front of it, inside the project you put it in. We do not run ads and we do not sell data.
Wavn gives no legal advice, no investment advice and makes no clinical calls, ever. It sharpens the surface on which professionals reach their own judgment, and keeps the record of how they did.
The argument is the safety feature. By design.
A product that shows its disagreement is a product you can calibrate against.